| |
|
|
June 30th, 2008 by terrih
Link to article here.
The only people left on the planet who think toll road proliferation the politicians courted by them. Politicians beware…your comeuppance is coming if you continue down this path. Just a $.20 cent per mile toll is like adding $5 to every gallon of gas you buy (if one’s vehicle gets 20 MPG). There’s nothing like a shrinking household budget (due to higher gas and now food prices) and stagnant wages to stir-up trouble at the ballot box!
Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008
Poll: 9 in 10 hit hard by gas prices
By ALAN FRAM
Associated Press Writer
Four-dollar gasoline has stolen a beach vacation from Julie Jacobs’ family, “little small luxuries” like exotic bath washes from Angela Crawford and dinners out from folks all over the country. Phil English has had to sell his beloved but fuel-guzzling red pickup.Like a plague that hits every economic class, race and age, soaring fuel prices are inflicting pain throughout the U.S. Nine in 10 people are expecting the ballooning costs to squeeze them financially over the next half-year, says an Associated Press-Yahoo News poll released Monday.
Nearly half think that hardship will be serious. To cope, most are driving less, easing off the air conditioning and heating at home and cutting corners elsewhere. Half are curtailing vacation plans; nearly as many are considering buying cars that burn less gas. U.S. auto companies are closing plants that make pickups and SUVs that people have stopped buying.
As the price of gasoline has spiraled upward, so, too, has the public’s ire.
Two-thirds consider gas prices an extremely important issue, edging the economy and outpacing health care and Iraq as the country’s most distressing problem. In November, when gas cost about $1 a gallon less than today, just under half rated it extremely important.
“Do you think there’s an end in sight? I don’t,” the 33-year-old Crawford, a Dallas homemaker, said in an interview.
She said switching to bar soap from a favored lotion is one of many “little small luxuries” she has given up, along with fewer restaurant meals and new clothes. She also has talked with her husband, a flooring contractor, about finding a job involving less long-distance driving with his heavy van.
“It’s depressing and it makes you nervous,” she said.
The AP-Yahoo News poll, conducted by Knowledge Networks, has tracked the same 2,000 people since last fall to see how their views change during the presidential campaign. The latest survey shows how the price of gasoline has caught or eclipsed every other issue, not just as a political topic but as a problem in people’s lives.
“You’re saddened prices are going up, and you can’t do the extra things you would have done,” said Amy Pysarenko, 35, of San Antonio, whose concern about gas prices has grown since November. She says while her family has cut back on amusement park visits and saving for their children, “I feel fortunate because maybe someone else eats beans instead of hamburgers.”
The 47 percent in the most recent survey who expect higher gas costs to cause serious hardship is about the same as in last year’s poll, but an increase from the 30 percent who said so in an AP-Ipsos poll in June 2004. Then, regular gas averaged $1.97 a gallon nationally, according to the federal Energy Information Administration.
Lower-income people are bearing the brunt of it. As higher prices push grocery, pizza delivery and other costs upward, just over half of those without college degrees - and about the same percentage of those earning less than $50,000 a year - are expecting serious personal financial problems to result.
“We just don’t do as much,” said William Fisk, 39, a former dishwasher in Freeport, Maine. “We used to go out to have dinner, but we’re cutting way back on that.”
Yet significant numbers of the better-off are feeling pain, too. Four in 10 people in families earning $50,000 to $100,000 annually, and one in six earning more than that, expect serious financial hardships from rising gas costs, as do one in three college graduates.
Many lower-earning families are responding by easing their use of air conditioning and heating, trimming vacation plans and cutting other spending. But higher-income people are not far behind.
Two-thirds of those earning under $25,000 a year are cooling and heating their homes less, as are nearly six in 10 people earning more than $100,000. Just over four in 10 of the lowest earners are cutting vacation spending - only slightly likelier than those earning at least six figures to do so.
Rich or poor, black or white, young or old, nearly everyone is looking to drive less: A nearly uniform seven in 10 say they are reducing driving. That compares with six in 10 who said so in an April 2005 AP-AOL survey.
Jacobs, a homemaker and mother of three in Baltimore, said gas costs forced her to turn down two summer trips - a cousin’s wedding in North Carolina and a vacation with her parents in Myrtle Beach, S.C.
“My parents said, ‘Come down, spend a week with us,’” said Jacobs, 35. “But when you add on the expense of gas, it’s just not worth it.”
Ironically, Jacobs plans to begin taking lessons this week for her first driver’s license. “Just as prices go through the roof,” she said.
Four in 10 are considering buying vehicles that get better gas mileage than their current ones. That is about the same percentage who said so three years ago.
Some have already taken that step. English of Papillion, Neb., sold his 1998 Ford pickup, which got about 13 miles per gallon, for a more fuel-efficient convertible.
“It was a nice truck,” said English, 43, an aircraft mechanic. “It didn’t feel good” to get rid of it “and it still doesn’t,” he said.
Midwesterners are among the likeliest to think rising gas costs will cause them serious personal hardship. Southerners are among the more willing to reduce driving.
As a political issue in the presidential campaign, gas prices provide a slight edge to Democrat Barack Obama. More prefer him over Republican John McCain to handle the problem, 28 percent to 20 percent, while an additional 18 percent trust both equally.
There is a strong sense of powerlessness. One-third do not think either candidate can deal with the problem. That includes half of independents, one-third of Republicans and one-quarter of Democrats.
The AP-Yahoo News survey of 1,759 adults was conducted from June 13-23 and had an overall margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.3 percentage points. Included were interviews with 844 Democrats and 637 Republicans, for whom the margins of sampling error were plus or minus 3.4 points and 3.9 points, respectively.
The poll was conducted over the Internet by Knowledge Networks, which initially contacted people using traditional telephone polling methods and followed with online interviews. People chosen for the study who had no Internet access were given it for free.
—
AP Director of Surveys Trevor Tompson and AP News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report.
Posted in General | No Comments »
June 30th, 2008 by terrih
Link to article here. With this kind of angst over gas prices, add tolls on top of it, and politcos can expect an explosion of taxpayer backlash against unsustainable transportation policies. Americans just don’t have the money to pony-up any more of the family budget for transportation!
Americans Blame Congress for Gas Prices, Consumer Reports Survey Shows
By Keriann Hopkins
CNSNews.com Corespondent
June 30, 2008
(CNSNews.com) - A Consumer Reports survey reveals that Americans are blaming Congress for high gas prices, which are compelling them to make shifts and sacrifices in their consuming habits.
The Auto Pulse Survey, conducted by Consumer Reports National Research Center, showed that 77 percent of consumers single out the government’s failure to implement an effective energy policy as a root cause for high gas prices; 75 percent of consumers blame oil companies; and 70 percent blame foreign oil producers.
When asked about actions the federal government could take to reduce fuel costs, 81 percent want to allow more drilling in the United States and offshore and 90 percent support increasing alternative energy development.
Among the respondents, 84 percent want to negotiate lower prices with oil-exporting nations, and 83 percent want to encourage conservation through tax incentives or alternative transportation.
In 2007, Consumer Reports found the “tipping point,” at which motorists said they would drastically reduce driving, to be $3.50 per gallon of gasoline. According to the Department of Transportation, Americans have driven 20 billion fewer miles this year compared to the same time period in 2007.
Compared with last year, more people walked or bicycled (31 percent) this year, carpooled (24 percent), worked from home (18 percent), used more public transportation (16 percent), and even moved closer to work (10 percent).
But the rising gas prices affect more than just the transportation decisions. Some troubling trends show 45 percent of respondents have been putting less money into savings accounts; 34 percent have cut back on essentials like food or healthcare; and 17 percent have charged more expenses on credit cards.
In addition, consumers are willing to make significantly more sacrifices when buying new cars. A full 54 percent of car owners would pay more for a vehicle with greater fuel-efficiency, and 80 percent are considering a diesel, flex-fuel or hybrid vehicle. That is up from 2007, when only 47 percent were interested in purchasing vehicles with alternative engines.
More than one-quarter of consumers have considered down-sizing to two-wheeled vehicles - 18 percent have considered motorcycles and 14 percent have contemplated scooters. Most of these respondents were men ages 18-34.
The Consumer Reports National Research Center interviewed by telephone a nationally representative probability sample of 884 people who drive a vehicle or whose household owns at least one vehicle.
Posted in General | No Comments »
June 26th, 2008 by terrih
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
TURF statement on TxDOT selecting private partner to develop TTC-69
Austin, TX, June 26, 2008
After the overwhelming public feedback preferred the “no build” option and after the Legislature made it clear it wanted time to slow down this train of privatizing our public infrastructure, TxDOT’s selection, today, of a private partner to develop TTC-69 is a total slap in the face to the people of Texas.
This proposal awarded to ZAI/ACS (Zachry American Infrastructure and ACS, based in Spain) is chalk full of egregious taxpayer exploitation. For instance, it tolls loops around Riviera, Driscoll, Corpus Christi and other cities (7 loops total) to fund non-toll improvements to Hwy 77 in yet another Robin Hood scheme. The deal gives ZAI/ACS a guaranteed 12% rate of return on their investment, and it relies heavily on public funds, like federal taxpayer backed private activity bonds (PABs) and TIFIA loans to front the vast majority of the construction costs and then gives all the profit to Zachry & ACS!
They also plan to use taxable zero coupon fixed rate bonds issued by the Cameron County Regional Mobility Authority and controversial Transportation Reinvestment Zone (TMZ) funds, which will essentially heist property taxes. The deal also gives ZAI/ACS cherry-picking rights (or right of first refusal) on multiple segments for the TTC-69 without being subjected to a competitive bidding process. The sham of an announcement pandering to landowners promising to use existing highways for TTC-69 wasn’t a concession at all. The private “partners” informed them the new corridor route wasn’t toll viable so they reverted back to using existing freeways (which would have been the tollway’s biggest revenue “competitor”) so as to capture more toll revenue. It was Cintra and Zachry who determined the re-route, not TxDOT being responsive to an outraged public!
“If this isn’t a wake-up call to the Legislature that it’s business as usual at TxDOT until they forcibly restrain them via state law, we don’t know what is. This removes any requirement for competitive bidding, which on its face is an absolute failure of the State’s fiduciary duty to protect the taxpayers from monopolistic sweetheart deals and what’s certain to be inflated costs. We must make Legislators pay at the ballot box for their malfeasance in granting the authority for such no-bid contracts and for failing to rein-in TxDOT with a GENUINE moratorium last year BEFORE this next private sweetheart deal got signed. If they don’t completely clean house at TxDOT and end this public fleecing, there won’t be enough political cover for the consequences at the ballot box. Enough is enough. End this now!” notes Terri Hall, TURF Founder.
“At today’s Transportation Commission meeting, it was a lovefest between David Zachry and the South Texas politicos pushing this nonsense. TxDOT and their buddies at Zachry/ACS found a way to follow the bare minimum of the law to sign this CDA and continue to steamroll a plan the majority of Texans don’t want. It was also evident the Transportation Commission is desperate to come up with their own alternative reforms since they’re facing an angry public demanding TxDOT be scrapped, a discontented Legislature, and scathing Sunset Commission recommendations,” observed Hank Gilbert, TURF Board member and acting President of the Piney Woods Subregional Planning Commission who attended and testified at today’s meeting.
For more detailed analysis of how TxDOT can legally award a Comprehensive Development Agreement (CDA) outside the moratorium (SB 792), go to TURF’s web site here.
-30-
________________________________________________________
Link to article here. Commission picks developer for I-69 project
Plan would build toll road loops around Corpus Christi, other cities
By JANET ELLIOTT
Houston Chronicle, Austin Bureau
June 26, 2008
AUSTIN — The Texas Transportation Commission on Thursday selected San Antonio’s Zachry Construction Corp. and a Spanish toll road developer to plan a superhighway from Texarkana to Brownsville.
The $5 million contract calls for Zachry American Infrastructure and ACS Infrastructure to create a financial plan for the Interstate 69 segment of the Trans-Texas Corridor.
“This team represents the best in the balance of local and global expertise necessary to complete a project of this scope,” said David Zachry, chief operating officer of Zachry Construction Corp.
The private developers’ plan calls for seven new loops around Corpus Christi and other cities to be constructed as toll roads. Revenue would pay for bringing existing stretches of U.S. 77 up to interstate standards. U.S. 77, however, would not be tolled.
They also propose 60 potential infrastructure projects, including commuter rail along U.S. 90 northeast of Houston, a bridge to Bolivar Peninsula, a container facility at Freeport and a desalinization plant in Brownsville. Transportation commissioners said, however, that there was no guarantee any of those projects will be built.
Houston route unknown
The final decision on the route for the corridor will be made by the Texas Department of Transportation through an ongoing environmental study. It is expected to roughly follow U.S. 59 through East Texas and south of Houston, and U.S. 77 south of Victoria.Earlier this month, TxDOT said it had abandoned plans to build part of the I-69 corridor through rural areas north and west of Houston. Instead, it said it would stick to major highways for most of the route.
The way through or around Houston has not been determined, although it could stay on U.S. 59 or go on Loop 610 or the planned Grand Parkway.
The developers’ financing ideas boosted their proposal over one submitted by a joint venture led by another Spanish company, Cintra, which is developing a master plan for the segment of the Trans-Texas Corridor slated to run from Oklahoma to Mexico, east of Interstate 35.
Zachry is a Cintra partner on the project paralleling I-35.
“We feel (this proposal) is the best value to the state,” said Mark Tomlinson, director of TxDOT’s turnpike division.
An anti-toll road group called the method of financing a “Robin Hood scheme.”
“TxDOT and their buddies at Zachry/ACS found a way to follow the bare minimum of the law to sign this (Comprehensive Development Agreement) and continue to steamroll a plan the majority of Texans don’t want,” said Hank Gilbert, a board member of Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom.
Toll roads operate locally
South Texas political leaders applauded the decision to move toward a longstanding goal of having the Rio Grande Valley served by an interstate highway.”It’s like getting indoor plumbing. We’ve waited that long for it, and it’s really important,” said Bill Summers, president of the Rio Grande Valley Partnership, a chamber of commerce group.
The I-69/TTC corridor is part of Gov. Rick Perry’s vision for a network of broad corridors linking major cities, with toll roads for cars and trucks, rail tracks for freight and passenger trains, and space for pipelines and power lines.
The corridor plans have been met with controversy due to opposition to tolls and concern that family farmland would be lost to development.
Corridor supporters say the routes would make the highways safer and improve the flow of goods by directing commercial traffic to designated lanes. Revenue from the state’s gasoline tax is insufficient to fund improvements, they say.
The developers plan to work with local authorities to operate $1.5 billion worth of toll roads. TxDOT spokesman Chris Lippincott said that arrangement would meet the requirements of a law passed last year that forbids private companies to operate toll roads.
Posted in General, Why Foreign Companies? | 1 Comment »
June 26th, 2008 by terrih
Link to article below here. Yep, TURF nailed it. Read our analysis earlier this week here. The moratorium bill only specifically prohibits awarding contracts to build and collect tolls. It does nothing to prevent TxDOT from awarding development contracts or what this story refers to as a “design” contract. It also reveals what we tried to sound the siren about years ago…the development rights contract granted to Cintra-Zachry for TTC-35 gave them the right of first refusal on 5-6 segments of that Trans Texas Corridor (verified in Cintra’s own annual report in 2005).
This removes any requirement for competitive bidding, which on it’s face is an absolute failure of the State’s fiduciary duty to protect the taxpayers from monopolistic sweetheart deals and what’s certain to be inflated costs. We must make Legislators pay at the ballot box for their malfeasance in granting the authority for such no-bid contracts and for failing to rein-in TxDOT with a GENUINE moratorium last year BEFORE this next private sweetheart deal got signed (or more appropriately, they should have banned these public-private partnerships, known as CDAs in Texas, altogether!).
TxDOT contract today will push Trans Texas Corridor forward
By MICHAEL LINDENBERGER / The Dallas Morning News
Thursday, June 26, 2008
AUSTIN — The second half of the massive Trans Texas Corridor will take a large step toward reality today, when state transportation officials award a $5 million design contract to a team of private toll road operators. The operators will develop a master plan for the portion of the project that will run from Northeast Texas to Houston and then to Mexico – about 650 miles.
The contract will not directly authorize the winning consortium to build any part of the super highway. But it will give the winning bidder a position of power for winning the much larger construction contracts — almost certainly to be worth billions of dollars – for the toll roads that will make up the super highway. The design contract will give the winning team 12 to 18 months to flesh out a master development plan for the project, which is expected to largely follow the path of the proposed southern extension of Interstate 69.
The two teams competing for the contract are led by subsidiaries of Spanish firms that are among the world’s largest toll road operators.
One, called ZAI ACS TTC-69, is run by Texas construction company Zachry American Infrastructure Inc. and ACS Infrastructure Development Inc., perhaps the world’s largest toll road developer.
The second, Bluebonnet Infrastructure, is led by Cintra, the Spanish firm that is already developing the master plan for the other half of the Trans Texas Corridor. Cintra last year won the design contract for the segment of the corridor that will run north to south, roughly parallel to Interstate 35. It is also the firm that was initially slated to build State Highway 121 in North Texas.
State transportation officials said Wednesday that Cintra’s contract to plan the 600-mile I-35 corridor of the Trans Texas Corridor is a good model for the contract to be announced today. Since winning a $3.5 million design contract for that project last year, Cintra has been working to develop plans for the massive network of toll roads that will stretch from the northern tip of Texas to Laredo.
Although that deal did not authorize the building of any aspect of the road itself, it did allow the firm to fast-track a proposal to build and operate a toll road on one of the most lucrative segments of the project, the State Highway 130 extension outside of Austin.
The extension of SH 130 had long been planned by state transportation officials as a gas-tax road, and then was considered as a publicly operated toll road. But officials of the Texas Department of Transportation said Wednesday that future toll revenues would not have been high enough to allow the state to borrow the full price of the project — well over $1 billion — in order to build it itself. Instead, it would have had to spend $600 million or more of scarce tax dollars on the project, said assistant executive director Phil Russell.
After winning the design contract last year, Cintra focused on that project and offered to pay the state $25 million for the right to build and operate the toll road. It also will cover all construction costs. Private operators are often able to borrow more money against future toll revenues because they accept far more riskier projections than the more conservative projects required by bond markets in which state or other public entities borrow.
Under the terms of its design contract, any proposal to build a toll road that does not require state tax dollars can be negotiated with Texas without competitive bids from other potential toll operators. Mr. Russell said the state accepted the proposal from Cintra because doing so fast-tracked the development of the badly needed toll road and allowed the state to save well over a half billion dollars in tax money.
The same kind of arrangements could flow from the contract announced today. Mr. Russell said, however, that the development agreements do not obligate the state to accept the winning firms’ proposals to build the more profitable aspects of the road. It can still reject those proposals, or require that the firms enter a competitive bidding process.
Posted in General, Why Foreign Companies? | No Comments »
June 26th, 2008 by terrih
Link to poll story here or read it below.
The headline declares Texans want their roads fixed but don’t want to pay for them. But it’s not a matter of not wanting to fund them, it’s a matter of economics. Texans don’t have any more money to give to transportation with gas at $4 a gallon! The cost of living is rising much faster than our ability to pay for it. Then, when you consider TxDOT spending $100,000 a month on lobbyists and $9 million on an ad campaign pushing toll roads and the Trans Texas Corridor, frivolous spending like $18 million rest stops with free Wi-Fi, and the endless raiding from our gas taxes that we ALREADY PAY for roads, it’s no wonder Texans are in no mood for tax hikes.
Add to all that the fact that the State of Texas has had surplus after surplus (which is a result of overtaxation) with another $15 billion surplus projected by the start of next year’s legislative session, Texans don’t believe the State is out of money or that we’re taxed too little, not for one minute!
I found it interesting that the poll didn’t use numbers at all like amount of gas tax hike or any cost comparisons on toll project costs versus freeways. Like on US 281, to keep it a freeway would cost $170 million, but to make it a toll road, it will cost $1.3 billion. This would likely draw much stronger opposition to tolling existing roads given that information. They also shied away from informing people about the specific number of lane-miles slated to be tolled and how much they’d pay per mile in tolls versus gas tax, which would help people make a more informed comparison of the choices and show that it will be difficult to avoid taking the more expensive toll roads with so many in the queue.
Nonetheless the message is clear, Texans don’t want tolls or higher transportation costs, period.
New poll shows Texans want better roads, don’t want to pay for them
By CHRISTY HOPPE / The Dallas Morning News
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
AUSTIN – Texans think congestion is a serious problem and want road improvements, but a solid majority is adamantly against paying at the toll booth or gas pump for bigger and better highways, a poll released today shows.
For state policy makers, “it shows the difficulty they’ve been having,” said James Henson, director of the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin.
Of the 1,000 Texans polled, 60 percent said they strongly oppose a hike in the state’s gas tax, while 46 percent strongly oppose tolls on new highways. Meanwhile, 53 percent said they strongly oppose tolls on existing highways.
The poll by the Texas Lyceum, a nonpartisan public policy group, showed that most Texans want to improve existing roadways as opposed to building new ones. They also would like to see a strong commitment to mass transit systems, such as light rail. There was also strong support for high-speed rail to connect cities such as Dallas, Austin and San Antonio.
In addition, 44 percent of Texans copped to talking on cell phones while driving, while 60 percent said they would favor a ban on such behavior.
Texans were also asked what they strongly would consider doing in the face of high gas prices. The number one answer – 66 percent – was buying a hybrid or more fuel efficient auto. The next was carpooling and a little over half said they are thinking about taking public transportation.
Only 37 percent said they would consider moving closer to work or school so that the commute would not be so far.
The poll, conducted June 12-20, has an error margin of 3.1 percentage points, meaning results can vary by that much in either direction.
Posted in General | No Comments »
June 25th, 2008 by terrih
Link to article here. See what we have to look forward to? Cintra won the development rights to TTC-35 project and now has control of SH 130, the first segment of the Trans Texas Corridor TTC-35 project. It’s also one of two bidders on TTC-69. Let’s not forget that the toll rates doubled this year. That’s why the foreign toll operators could “invest” $46 million in improvements. It’s a cash cow!
Drivers complain about virtually all aspects of Indiana Toll Road
Landline Magazine
June 24, 2008
In Indiana, several state offices are being bombarded with complaints from drivers about the Indiana Toll Road, which is operated by two foreign companies.
According to The Associated Press, drivers complained about time-consuming backups at toll gates, dirty restrooms at travel plazas, and inflated fuel prices. Some people also complained about the toll road’s mascot – the “I-Zoom Girl” – saying she is a little too curvaceous and that the campaign using her portrays Hoosiers as hillbillies.
The toll road operators – Cintra of Spain and Macquarie of Australia – have since addressed some of the problems. The companies stated that they’ve spent $46 million on electronic tolling and a new fleet of snowplows.
Posted in General, Why Foreign Companies? | No Comments »
June 25th, 2008 by terrih
While we applaud the Senator for having the foresight to prevent the Highway Trust Fund from going bankrupt in the near future, she did vote for the last highway bill (SAFETEA-LU in 2005) that contained more than 6,000 earmarks for congressional pet projects, including the bridge to nowhere in Alaska and a parking garage for a PRIVATE university (University of Incarnate Word). We have no “trust fund” because politicians keep perpetually raiding it, just like the Texas Legislature siphons off nearly 50% of our gas taxes for non-transportation related things like tourism promotion, mental health, and school buses. We need to demand Congress get their priorities straight before the taxpayers go BANKRUPT!
Highway Trust Fund Cut threatens Texas Highways
By Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
San Antonio Express-News
06-25-08
The federal Highway Trust Fund, which is the largest single source of funding for Texas’ 79,000 miles of roads, is on the brink of insolvency.
Unless Congress takes action, there will be a 34 percent cut in U.S. highway and bridge investment, which will cause our transportation infrastructure to deteriorate and our economy to suffer. I am working in bipartisan cooperation with other members of the Texas congressional delegation to prevent this from happening.
In recent years, funding has been borrowed from the Highway Trust Fund for emergencies, like the devastating Minneapolis-St. Paul bridge collapse in 2007. These funds must be replenished in order to maintain the solvency of the trust fund.
If the federal Highway Trust Fund goes in the red, our state will be one of the biggest losers.
Texas could expect nearly 30 percent less in highway maintenance and improvement funds for fiscal year 2009. Nearly 30,000 Texans would lose their construction jobs, the second greatest loss of any state.
The decline in road capacity also would have a detrimental effect on our economy.
The Texas Transportation Institute reports that congestion in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area already costs the local economy $2.7 billion in lost productivity and wasted fuel every year. Houston is not far behind with an annual loss of $2.3 billion.
In the Senate, I introduced a measure that will replenish the Highway Trust Fund and keep highway projects funded through 2009. The legislation must still be approved in the House of Representatives and signed by the president to go into effect.
However, we need a long-term fix.
When Congress does consider a permanent solution to maintain the solvency of the federal Highway Trust Fund, I will work to make sure Texas receives its fair share of transportation dollars. We’ve already made great strides in this area.
When I came to the Senate in 1993, our state received only 76 cents in transportation funding for every onedollar we paid in gas taxes. But in the years since, I have worked with my colleagues to increase our average annual funding by almost $800 million — or 92 cents on the dollar — making Texas second only to California in federal transportation support.
The money Texans pay should be used on Texas roads, and I will continue my efforts to secure a 100 percent return on our gas tax dollars.
In Texas, some of our new major projects may rely on toll funding in one form or another. I believe that tolls can be useful as one part of the solution when done with local input and consent.
A perfect example is the George Bush Tollway in North Texas. But tolls should never be placed on highways that have already been paid for by Texas taxpayers. That would be a violation of the public trust. Although we need to solve our transportation problems, we must do it in a way that is fair and honorable to the people of Texas.
Businesses and communities depend on efficient, properly managed infrastructure, which allows people to live and work wherever they choose.
We must work hard to find responsible solutions to our transportation needs to keep our residents safe and our economy thriving.
Posted in General | No Comments »
June 25th, 2008 by terrih
Are we supposed to take this “task force” seriously? They call this a “community” effort? Not when only pro-toll, Chamber of Commerce, big money wheelers and dealers are on this task force, with the exception of our good friend Bill Barker, transportation planner and expert who has worked in the industry for more than 30 years. With tollers Hope Andrade, Richard Perez, Jack Leonhardt, Jim Reed, and Terrell McCombs on the task force, we’re not holding our breath to see any non-toll, affordable, self-sustaining transportation solutions out of this crowd.
However, the formation of this task force is an admission of guilt that our region has failed to plan for our future transportation needs responsibly and with any foresight. Bill Barker has warned for years that we’re approaching “peak oil” (that the Chinese predicted to happen in 2010, where were we?) and that gas prices would soon reach levels that forced motorists to look for other modes of transportation. This task force also demonstrates that toll roads with gas at $4 a gallon and rising are totally unsustainable.
____________________________________
Bexar County Commissioners Court
NEWS
For immediate release:
County, city form group to look at transportation issues
Bexar County Judge Nelson Wolff and Mayor Phil Hardberger have appointed an 11-member Transportation Task Force that will assess existing transportation plans and priorities in order to make local policy as well as state and federal legislative recommendations. The task force will begin its work in July and make a state legislative recommendation in November, with final proposals delivered by the end of the year.
As San Antonio and Bexar County continue to grow at a healthy pace, it is
imperative to ensure the transportation systems are viable, efficient and
integrated to support the growing population and lessen the environmental
impacts. Rising fuel prices, the overall economic downturn throughout the
country and stricter federal pollution standards make the work of the task force even more critical and timely.
“We’ve learned that when this community works together on something, we can really get a lot accomplished,” Judge Wolff said. “We look forward to creating a strategy for successful transportation planning that can take us well into the future.”
The task force’s scope of work will specifically cover existing transportation plans and priorities, modes of travel, financing options, and regulatory and legislative contexts. The group also will compare this community’s transportation system to comparable regions in the state and country, critically review existing plans and investment priorities and provide a set of “next steps” for local transportation agencies.
The task force will work with support from the staffs of the County, City, San Antonio Mobility Coalition, Alamo Area Council of Governments, Texas
Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Planning Organization, Regional Mobility Authority and VIA Metropolitan Transit.
The members of the task force are:
● Hope Andrade, former chairwoman of the Texas Transportation Commission
● Bill Barker, Sierra Club and Green Space Alliance member
● Mary Briseno, VIA board member
● Jack Leonhardt, AACOG board I and mayor of City of Windcrest
● James Lifshutz, VIA board member
● Terrell McCombs, San Antonio Mobility Coalition chairman
● Richard Perez, Greater San Antonio Chamber of Commerce president/CEO
and former city councilman
● Rick Pych, VIA board member
● Jim Reed, Regional Mobility Authority board member
● Linda Chavez-Thompson, VIA board member
● Derrick Howard, CPS Energy board member
“I’m very pleased with the lineup of individuals we’ll have on this task force,” said Mayor Hardberger, who will chair the group with Judge Wolff.
“Developing a comprehensive transportation plan for our area is critical as we continue to grow, and we must do it together.”
The task force’s meetings will be open to the public and resources and reports will be posted to a Web site hosted on the County’s site at www.bexar.org.
- 30 -
Posted in General | No Comments »
June 24th, 2008 by terrih
TURF Committee Report Response
Overall, we’re delighted that the Sunset Commission sees the need for fundamental reform at TxDOT, and acknowledges that simply tweaking some things or maintaining status quo will not suffice to restore the public trust in this agency or in transportation decision-making around the state.
However, in response to the Committee Report, we have some further suggestions we need the Commission to recommend to the Legislature.
ISSUE 1
SINGLE ELECTED COMMISSIONER
While the Sunset Committee staff recommends abolishing the Transportation Commission and replacing it with a single commissioner, we DO NOT need to have that position APPOINTED by the Governor, giving us more of the same. The new head of this agency needs to answer directly to the people of Texas through statewide election. We need an independent representative who answers to the voters and who represents the entire state, as a whole, in transportation matters. A single elected commissioner also avoids chopping up the state by region with regional commissioners, which inevitably pits region against region, urban against rural, and may compromise seamless transportation throughout the state. When 76% of the feedback you received from the public asked for an elected commissioner, it’s abundantly clear that’s what the people of Texas want the Legislature to adopt.
ISSUE 2
PROJECT PROGRAMMING – NEED FREEWAY VS TOLLWAY “NEEDS” ANALYSIS
We agree that TxDOT and MPO planning mechanisms are broken. We need to end the toll road wish lists (TMMP plans that even the Governor admitted were based on an if-money-were-no-object principle) and get a true side-by-side, apples to apples comparison of the cost of fixing our roads and keeping them freeways versus the cost of turning them into tollways. If it’s anything like the US 281 project in Bexar County, TxDOT/ARMA has turned a $100 million gas tax funded FREEway plan into a $1.3 billion toll project. This side-by-side comparison will help Legislators and the public discern our true “unfunded needs” if we truly have any, since we cannot rely on TxDOT’s “funding gap” figures to be accurate. Then and only then can we accurately assess funding our roads in the least invasive, most affordable, and most transparent fashion.
ISSUE 3
PROPAGANDA VERSUS EDUCATION CAMPAIGNS
TURF is suing the State to STOP TxDOT’s propaganda campaign called Keep Texas Moving, which advocates the Trans Texas Corridor, privatization, and tolling. Just look at the fixation on tolling over other funding options on TxDOT’s web sites. The Committee Report highlights no less than 3 web sites dedicated to tolling using taxpayer money. The information found on these sites only extols the benefits of tolling and privatization (never any criticisms) to the exclusion of other modes of transportation and other forms of financing. Conveniently, tolling puts the most money in TxDOT’s coffers and creates a slush fund not subject to federal law, which has higher environmental and public involvement standards.
The Sunset Commission needs to strongly recommend to the Legislature that we need a statute that clearly spells out what TxDOT is authorized to do as far as marketing. A statute must include restriction of advertising toll roads (restrict to “Get your toll tag here” for toll projects already built and open to traffic) and advocating one policy over another through its web sites, public information resources, staff time and resources. The law must also clearly prohibit not only advocacy of certain policies over another (versus truly educational campaigns like “Click it or ticket”), but also enforce the prohibition against state agencies lobbying using taxpayer money. TURF would be happy to share the evidence we’ve uncovered in our lawsuit that shows the blatant political nature of the ad campaign and that also documents illegal lobbying, including the hiring of registered lobbyists, by TxDOT.
NOT JUST PUBLIC “INVOLVEMENT,” BUT PUBLIC VETO POWER
There are no specific public involvement recommendations that would force TxDOT to do what the public asks them to, particularly in regards to toll projects and the Trans Texas Corridor. Simply taking public testimony and then ignoring it is what has caused a massive revolt against transportation policies all over the state! We need some public involvement REQUIREMENTS that FORCE TxDOT to implement the alternative chosen by the public, not the one that makes the State the most tax revenue. Whether it be a public vote on all toll projects, or through public comment on projects through public hearings, something must be done to give the taxpayers who foot the bill the final say, including how the project is financed, on the best alternative for their community.
TRANSPARENCY, NOT LIP SERVICE
SB 792 tried to force more transparency with the financial terms for toll projects. However, the financial guts of these projects are still being withheld from the public, by law. For instance, as long as TxDOT calls something a “draft” document, they do not have to release it. Also, the market valuation studies and toll viability studies (also called traffic and revenue studies) that reveal the genuine feasibility of these projects, the structure of the bonds, and if the tolling entity plans to refinance and backload a toll, are not being released per SB 792.
The San Antonio MPO, for instance, was asked to give final approval of the financial terms on the US 281 toll project in December 2007 without having access to the actual market value study or documents showing the financial terms of the deal (which aren’t required to be disclosed per SB 792 until 30 days prior to letting a contract). The public hearing revealing this financial information didn’t happen until June 2008, and the meeting was held at 1:00 PM in the middle of the workday 20 miles from the project area. The purpose of a public meeting is to solicit public comment, and when the tolling entity holds the meeting when the vast majority of the population is at work as far away from the project area as possible, the meeting can in no way be legitimate. The whole process is secretive and absolutely backwards! If the public objects to the structure of a deal, how can they stop it if the MPO already approved it prior to disclosure of the information? It’s insane to withhold these documents from the public and even our Legislators when they’re being asked to give FINAL APPROVAL for the toll rates and terms of these deals at the MPO.
This practice has got to stop! If a toll project is in the public’s best interest, then it should withstand the light of day.
ISSUE4
END THE “BEST VALUE” PROPOSAL AND PAYMENT TO LOSING BIDDERS, IT’S A TAXPAYER RIP-OFF
The report mentions that toll contracts are different than the Department’s traditional contracts. This differing standard shows the disproportionate emphasis and special privileges given to toll road contractors not otherwise enjoyed on non-toll projects. Rather than require TxDOT use the lowest bid, toll contracts are allowed a nebulous “best value” bid. State law also allows payments of to $1 million to losing bidders on toll projects.
This policy creates an entire pro-toll lobby through road contractors themselves who will profit handsomely by merely bidding on a toll project and it allows them to re-coup a cost of doing business that other industries do not enjoy when bidding on government projects. This practice is a total waste of taxpayer money and needlessly inflates the cost of transportation. No other bidders on government contracts get this pay-off, and it’s likely to spread to other government agencies. This is NOT a precedent the taxpayers want to set. The Sunset Committee’s job is to identify waste, fraud, and abuse, The “best value bid” and payments to losing bidders qualify! Get rid of them!
DO NOT RE-AUTHORIZE CDAS
If the public outcry over privatizing our public infrastructure wasn’t loud enough in the 80th Legislative Session, then what more must the public do to end this risky, extremely expensive method of delivering toll projects? How quickly the testimony from Dennis Enright of Northwest Financial in New Jersey before the Senate Transportation Committee March 1, 2007 has been forgotten. Mr. Enright said there is no risk transfer to the private entity and that CDAs cost the taxpayers of a minimum of 50% more than public toll roads. Mr. Enright rightly called toll roads monopolies by their very nature. He also said it’s always best to keep these projects in the public NOT private sector. So why are CDAs being discussed at all? We wouldn’t need all the recommended extra oversight and bureaucracy if CDAs were not re-authorized. There were 20 lawyers present at the signing of the SH 130 CDA. Such waste of taxpayer money when TxDOT is claiming we’re out of money for roads is the height of hypocrisy! Public infrastructure (a government sanctioned monopoly free of competition) that Texans depend on for daily living shouldn’t be under the control of private companies whose primary motive, naturally, is profit, not the public interest.
OTHER AREAS NOT ADDRESSED
ABOLISH UNACCOUNTABLE RMAS, FIX MPOS
The Committee Report was silent on the problems with Regional Mobility Authorities enacted through HB 3588 in 2003, but touches on some of the problems at MPOs. MPOs and RMAs are just as tone deaf to the will of the public as TxDOT. Hundreds of people can fill their boardrooms and submit public comments opposing toll projects, yet they proceed with tolling anyway. RMAs are subdivisions of the State, and though local county commissioners appoint most board members and often provide some start-up loans, they are funded primarily by TxDOT and an extension of TxDOT’s toll-first mentality. They’re merely a front for local control. When TxDOT shows them the money, we know who holds the wheel.
RMAs are essentially created to sell bonds and toll roads, and they were created without a public vote. We have the Texas Turnpike Authority, TxDOT, and now RMAs. We do not need all of this duplication in effort. RMAs are mini-TxDOTs, they don’t answer to the people, and pit region against region (board members from one part of a city vote to toll another part of the city). We’ve also found that even though Board members are appointed by Commissioners representing various precincts, the majority of appointees do not reside in the areas to be tolled, leaving those who will be tolled without representation. The same is true of MPOs. The regions that won’t be tolled vote with TxDOT to toll the regions that are proposed to be tolled, leaving the citizens who will bear the tax increase with no meaningful representation.
If a law is enacted as suggested in the “PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT” section giving the public the ability to choose the best alternative for road projects, it must also apply to overruling an MPO plan that may designate a project as a toll road. The PEOPLE should have the final say, period.
END THE FIXATION ON TOLLING
The Transportation Commission passed a Minute Order on December 18, 2003 mandating all new capacity to Texas roads be studied for tolls first. This policy is why TxDOT is tolling everything in sight, and the Legislature must step-in to change the direction.
With gas at $4 a gallon, and driving decreasing for the first time in more than 30 years, we have to revisit this shift to tolling. We’re in uncharted territory as it relates to fuel and energy costs, even topping the inflation adjusted high of 1980. Selling billions in bonds for toll projects that depend on high growth rates and old patterns of driving for 40-50 years at a time, is foolish and unsustainable in the long-term. Some of these RMAs are foregoing buying bond insurance for multi-million dollar toll projects. This leaves the taxpayers on the hook to bail out failed toll projects. We’re setting up the taxpayers for an Enron/mortgage-crisis style bail out.
Posted in General | No Comments »
June 23rd, 2008 by terrih
The Texas Transportation Commission meeting this Thursday has an agenda item that shows the Commission will consider executing a private toll contract for the development of Trans Texas Corridor TTC-69 despite the moratorium prohibiting private toll contracts through September of 2009. Cintra is likely who had the most influence in the change in route for TTC-69 since Senator Steve Ogden let the cat out of the bag the week before our rally saying the TTC-69 new corridor was “dead.” This is because the new route for the corridor was deemed by the private bidders NOT to be toll viable (they weren’t getting any bites from the private sector to build it because it wouldn’t make enough money).
So they had to go back to existing footprint to toll the “competing” existing freeway so as to capture more toll revenue outside the Houston area (which was likely the only toll viable segment of the new corridor alternative). One of the reasons we objected to the moratorium bill, SB 792, was because it excepted out portions of TTC-69 from the bill allowing it to move forward.
The language of the moratorium seems only to block contracts allowing the private entity to collect tolls. There are many types of private toll contracts for the various phases of development. Since TxDOT may not be granting a construction contract that allows the collection of tolls yet, TxDOT may in fact be authorized to choose and execute a contract with a “developer” or “planning partner” for TTC-69. First they sign a deal for development and financing, then for design, construction, and collection of tolls of the individual segments.
See the agenda item for Thursday’s Transpsortation Commission Meeting below:
6. Toll Road Projects
a. Various Counties – Act on the recommendation of department staff concerning:
(1) the selection of the best value proposal for the planning, development,
acquisition, design, construction, financing, maintenance, and operation of the
element of the Trans-Texas Corridor System from Northeast Texas to the
Texas/Mexico border (I-69/TTC); and (2) the execution of a comprehensive
development agreement for I-69/TTC
Here’s the text of SB 792 that allows private toll contracts (called comprehensive
development agreement) to be executed for portions of TTC-69 (here referred to using the federal name of “high priority corridors 18 & 20″) :
(f) Subsection (b) does not apply to a comprehensive
development agreement in connection with a project:
(1) on the ISTEA High Priority Corridor identified in
Sections 1105(c)(18) and (20) of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Pub. L. No. 102-240), as
amended by Section 1211 of the Transportation Equity Act for the
21st Century (Pub. L. No. 105-178, as amended by Title IX, Pub. L.
No. 105-206), including land adjacent to the project needed to
widen the project for a transportation use, if the project remains
in a highway corridor designated by those laws; and
(2) located south of Refugio County.
Also, the moratorium on private toll contracts leaves out the word “develop” in its prohibition. It seems to allow TxDOT to sign a development contract for the TTC-69 corridor which is still allowed in Subchapter 223 of the Transportation Code and is different from a design and construction contract (directly involving the collection of tolls). Though the Commission’s agenda item for Thursday includes the whole enchilada (development, design, construction, etc.), their Request for Proposals so far involves just what they refer to as a “planning partner.”
SB 792 language with no reference to “development” and allows these contracts if it doesn’t involve collecting tolls yet:
(b) comprehensive development agreement entered into with
a private participant by a toll project entity on or after May 1,
2007, for the acquisition, design, construction, financing,
operation, or maintenance of a toll project may not contain a
provision permitting the private participant to operate the toll
project or collect revenue from the toll project, regardless of
whether the private participant operates the toll project or
collects the revenue itself or engages a subcontractor or other
entity to operate the toll project or collect the revenue.
Language of the Transportation Code giving the authority for comprehensive development agreements:
§ 223.201. AUTHORITY. (a) Subject to Section 223.202,
the department may enter into a comprehensive development agreement
with a private entity to design, develop, finance, construct,
maintain, repair, operate, extend, or expand a:
(1) toll project;
(2) facility or a combination of facilities on the
Trans-Texas Corridor;
AND LATER…(it tells how the moratorium doesn’t apply to CDAs that don’t directly involve the collection of tolls)
(h) Subsection (f) does not apply to a comprehensive
development agreement that does not grant a private entity a right
to finance a toll project or to a comprehensive development
agreement in connection with a project:
(1) that includes one or more managed lane facilities
to be added to an existing controlled-access highway;
(2) the major portion of which is located in a
nonattainment or near-nonattainment air quality area as designated
by the United States Environmental Protection Agency; and
(3) for which the department has issued a request for
qualifications before May 1, 2007.
So at Thursday’s Commission meeting we’ll all see how TxDOT tries to wiggle around the citizens’ vehement objections to privatizing our public infrastructure and plowing ahead with the universally detested Trans Texas Corridor!
Posted in General, Why Foreign Companies? | 4 Comments »
|
|
|